Becoming Black: Ideality and Reality in Barth and Cone

This article compares and contrasts James Cone’s use of “blackness” with Karl Barth’s use of “Israel”. It argues that, by contrast with Barth’s overdetermined use of “Israel” as a fixed designator for a fixed people, “black” for Cone is a deliberately mobile designator, shifting (roughly) between sk...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ticciati, Susannah (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group 2023
In: Black theology
Year: 2023, Volume: 21, Issue: 2, Pages: 98-113
Further subjects:B racial capitalism
B Blackness
B Cone
B Barth
B Israel
B Election
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:This article compares and contrasts James Cone’s use of “blackness” with Karl Barth’s use of “Israel”. It argues that, by contrast with Barth’s overdetermined use of “Israel” as a fixed designator for a fixed people, “black” for Cone is a deliberately mobile designator, shifting (roughly) between skin colour, ancestry and cultural heritage, and political and theological disposition. It thus has the requisite suppleness to enable Cone’s theology to speak prophetically both into the specific context of oppression for which he writes, and beyond. Barth’s theology, prophetic in principle, but lacking attentiveness to his Jewish neighbours, fails to achieve the same level of pertinence. The article continues by arguing that racial capitalist critique can be understood as a faithful outworking of Cone’s legacy, the oppressive logic of racial capitalism providing a significant context within which to understand what “becoming black” might mean today.
ISSN:1743-1670
Contains:Enthalten in: Black theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/14769948.2023.2233307