The Chariot of the Soul. A Commentary on Plato, PHAEDRUS, 246a-254b and KAŢHA-UPANIŞAD I, 3.3-9
From a hermeneutical perspective, the elucidation of the origin of the Platonic myth of the chariot of the soul represents a stake of the highest importance. Summing up some previous interpretations of a comparative locus classicus, the author tries in this paper to answer: could Plato be invested w...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Romanian Association for the History of Religions
2007
|
| Dans: |
Archaeus
Année: 2007, Volume: XII, Pages: 337-350 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Theology
B Humanities B Law B Social Sciences B Balkan journals B Download Central and Eastern European Journals B Psychology B Religion B Eastern European B Philology B Political Science B Archeology B CEE books B Central European Articles B Feminism B CEE periodicals B Sociology B Central and Eastern European documents B ebooks B East European Journals B Cultural Journal B History of Culture B East European Culture B Philosophy |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | From a hermeneutical perspective, the elucidation of the origin of the Platonic myth of the chariot of the soul represents a stake of the highest importance. Summing up some previous interpretations of a comparative locus classicus, the author tries in this paper to answer: could Plato be invested with authorship regarding the writing of the myth about the ontology of the soul? Would it be possible to devise a sum of arguments susceptible to unveil that the Platonic writing of the myth about the charioteer, the chariot and the horses of the soul is, in fact, a re-writing of an archaic, previous source, the content of which was borrowed inside the Greek philosophical space from another, alien, cultural-religious space? |
|---|---|
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Archaeus
|