A Diagnosis of Cartesian Atheism: Petrus van Mastricht’s Critique of Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise
The present paper analyzes Petrus van Maistricht’s (1630–1706) critique of Baruch Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise found in his Novitatum cartesianarum gangraena (1677). The paper shows, first, that Mastricht regarded Spinoza’s atheism as the inevitable outcome of the Cartesians’ denial of p...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Contributors: | |
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
2023
|
In: |
Church history and religious culture
Year: 2023, Volume: 103, Issue: 1, Pages: 39-59 |
Further subjects: | B
Atheism
B Petrus van Mastricht B early modern philosophy B Christoph Wittich B Baruch Spinoza B Reformed Theology B Cartesianism B René Descartes |
Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
Summary: | The present paper analyzes Petrus van Maistricht’s (1630–1706) critique of Baruch Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise found in his Novitatum cartesianarum gangraena (1677). The paper shows, first, that Mastricht regarded Spinoza’s atheism as the inevitable outcome of the Cartesians’ denial of philosophy’s subordination to theology. Second, Mastricht, in refuting Spinoza, revised his earlier critique of Cartesianism. In his previous work, Mastricht had already pointed out the atheistic implications of Cartesianism, but in the Gangraena he could now clearly identify Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise as the atheistic consequence of Cartesianism. He was thus able to confirm his distinctive diagnosis of Cartesianism as a gangrene that would gradually worsen and eventually destroy the entire body of theology. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1871-2428 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Church history and religious culture
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/18712428-bja10054 |