Why We Might Still need a Theory for the Religious Development of Women
Two criteria for answering the question raised by H. Reich (this issue) are taken up: Have psychological processes in relation to gender been given sufficient attention in existing theories? Are these theories comprehensive enough to cover the whole range of phenomena in question? In a 3rd step, Rei...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
1997
|
In: |
The international journal for the psychology of religion
Year: 1997, Volume: 7, Issue: 2, Pages: 87-91 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
Summary: | Two criteria for answering the question raised by H. Reich (this issue) are taken up: Have psychological processes in relation to gender been given sufficient attention in existing theories? Are these theories comprehensive enough to cover the whole range of phenomena in question? In a 3rd step, Reich's suggestion not to change the theory but to improve interviewing and scoring procedures is critically examined. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1532-7582 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: The international journal for the psychology of religion
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1207/s15327582ijpr0702_2 |