A Human Communication Approach to Interreligious Dialogue

Interreligious dialogue schemes based upon different faith traditions exist; however, to chose one scheme over another can generate religious tensions, possible accusations of bias and even event-cum-religion snubbing. One way of circumventing this potential problem is to adopt a generic, non-sectar...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kozlovic, Anton Karl (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: AASR 2003
In: Australian religion studies review
Year: 2003, Volume: 16, Issue: 1, Pages: 49-74
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1846022258
003 DE-627
005 20230523145345.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230523s2003 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1846022258 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1846022258 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Kozlovic, Anton Karl  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Kozlovic, Anton Karl  |a Kozlovic, Anton K.  |a Kozlovic, Anton 
245 1 2 |a A Human Communication Approach to Interreligious Dialogue 
264 1 |c 2003 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Interreligious dialogue schemes based upon different faith traditions exist; however, to chose one scheme over another can generate religious tensions, possible accusations of bias and even event-cum-religion snubbing. One way of circumventing this potential problem is to adopt a generic, non-sectarian model based upon human communication science. The critical literature was reviewed and Taylor et al.'s (1977) classic transactional communication model (TCM) was explicated. This eight-element model comprising of (1) Source, (2) Stimulus, (3) Receiver, (4) Sensory Receptors, (5) Interpretation/Response, (6) Noise, (7) Feedback and (8) Situation/Context was applied to a hypothetical bi-lateral dialogue to demonstrate its methodological viability. This scientific (re)conceptualisation of dialoguing redefined its constitutive elements, provided new insights into the theoretical foundations of the enterprise, and highlighted important praxis requirements for the design, organisation and running of future events. Further research into this exciting interdisciplinary field was recommended. 
601 |a communicare 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Australian religion studies review  |d St. Lucia, Qld : AASR, 2005  |g 16(2003), 1, Seite 49-74  |w (DE-627)513219749  |w (DE-600)2238779-1  |w (DE-576)255268017  |x 1744-9014  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:16  |g year:2003  |g number:1  |g pages:49-74 
856 4 0 |u https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/ARSR/article/view/8987  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 16  |j 2003  |e 1  |h 49-74 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 432476784X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1846022258 
LOK |0 005 20230523145345 
LOK |0 008 230523||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL