Bona Fama in an Age of "Transparency": Publishing Lists of "Credibly Accused" Clerics
The practice of making the names of clerics "credibly accused" of sexual abuse of minors publicly accessible has become the norm in recent decades. This practice must be considered in light of conciliar teachings as well as civil and canonical doctrine on the right to a good reputation. It...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2022
|
| In: |
The jurist
Year: 2022, Volume: 78, Issue: 2, Pages: 445-476 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
USA
/ Priest
/ Abuse
/ Sex crimes
/ Vatican Council 2. (1962-1965 : Vatikanstadt)
/ Catholic church, Verfasserschaft1, Codex iuris canonici (1983). 220
|
| IxTheo Classification: | SA Church law; state-church law SB Catholic Church law |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
| Summary: | The practice of making the names of clerics "credibly accused" of sexual abuse of minors publicly accessible has become the norm in recent decades. This practice must be considered in light of conciliar teachings as well as civil and canonical doctrine on the right to a good reputation. It is essential to weigh carefully many factors when determining what is demanded by the need for transparency, especially such considerations as the right to a good reputation (bona fama), the definition of credibility, the utility of listing names of the deceased, and the necessity of repairing the reputation of those clerics who have been wrongfully accused. Ultimately, the practice of publicly listing the names of clerics who have been accused of abuse must be carefully weighed against the clerics' legal and natural right to a good reputation. |
|---|---|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: The jurist
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1353/jur.2022.0020 |