The Principle of Proportionality Regarding Non-Penal Singular Administrative Acts in the Recent Jurisprudence of the Apostolic Signatura
Executive authority in the Church has an ample margin of discretion in choosing between (legitimate) courses of action. Except for limited areas, the law (lex) itself does not guide the executive authority in how to weigh options in making decisions for non-penal singular administrative acts. Recent...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Catholic University of America
2022
|
In: |
The jurist
Year: 2022, Volume: 78, Issue: 2, Pages: 413-444 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1845648919 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230517164005.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230517s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1353/jur.2022.0017 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1845648919 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1845648919 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Reilley, Patrick R. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Principle of Proportionality Regarding Non-Penal Singular Administrative Acts in the Recent Jurisprudence of the Apostolic Signatura |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Executive authority in the Church has an ample margin of discretion in choosing between (legitimate) courses of action. Except for limited areas, the law (lex) itself does not guide the executive authority in how to weigh options in making decisions for non-penal singular administrative acts. Recent developments in jurisprudence at the level of the Apostolic Signatura have highlighted the principle of proportionality as an important criterion for evaluating the proper response in certain causes regarding contentious-administrative recourse. | ||
601 | |a Proportion | ||
601 | |a Singular | ||
601 | |a Administration | ||
601 | |a Apostoliker | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The jurist |d Washington, D.C. : Catholic University of America, 1941 |g 78(2022), 2, Seite 413-444 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)543191230 |w (DE-600)2386447-3 |w (DE-576)294349294 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:78 |g year:2022 |g number:2 |g pages:413-444 |
776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |w (DE-627)1861606923 |k Non-Electronic | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1353/jur.2022.0017 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/16/article/878012 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
951 | |a AR | ||
CAN | |a 1 | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4323150490 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1845648919 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20230517164005 | ||
LOK | |0 008 230517||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
SUB | |a CAN |