Omnipotence, Gaps, and Curry
In "God of the Gaps: A Neglected Reply to God's Stone Problem", Jc Beall and A. J. Cotnoir offer a gappy solution to the paradox of (unrestricted) omnipotence that is typified by the classic stone problem. Andrew Tedder and Guillermo Badia, however, have recently argued that this solu...
| Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
|---|---|
| Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
| Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
| Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Έκδοση: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
2022
|
| Στο/Στη: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Έτος: 2022, Τόμος: 14, Τεύχος: 4, Σελίδες: 141-148 |
| Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
Curry’s paradox
B paradox of omnipotence B gappy logic B unrestricted omnipotence |
| Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Σύνοψη: | In "God of the Gaps: A Neglected Reply to God's Stone Problem", Jc Beall and A. J. Cotnoir offer a gappy solution to the paradox of (unrestricted) omnipotence that is typified by the classic stone problem. Andrew Tedder and Guillermo Badia, however, have recently argued that this solution could not be extended to a more serious Curry-like version of the paradox. In this paper, we show that such a gappy solution does extend to it. |
|---|---|
| Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: European journal for philosophy of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.24204/ejpr.2022.3796 |