Political Theology in Iran: Critiques of the Guardianship of Jurist in Light of Reformist Iranian Scholarship

This article examines a specific line of thinking shared by several contemporary Iranian reformist scholars which emerged partly in response to the doctrine of velāyat-e faqīh, a political-theological theory instigated by Ayatollah Khomeini. Focusing on the ideas of reformist Iranian scholars, such...

Полное описание

Сохранить в:  
Библиографические подробности
Главный автор: Akbar, Ali (Автор)
Формат: Электронный ресурс Статья
Язык:Английский
Проверить наличие: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Загрузка...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Опубликовано: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group 2023
В: Political theology
Год: 2023, Том: 24, Выпуск: 3, Страницы: 302-320
Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности):B Humainī, Ruḥallāh M. 1902-1989 / Iran / Revolution / Political theology / Political theory / Wilāyat al-faqīh
Индексация IxTheo:AD Социология религии
BJ Ислам
KBL Ближний Восток
NCD Политическая этика
TK Новейшее время
ZC Общая политика
Другие ключевые слова:B Khomeini
B Iran
B Guardianship of the Jurist
B reformist scholars
B Islamic Government
B Democracy
B Political Theology
Online-ссылка: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Описание
Итог:This article examines a specific line of thinking shared by several contemporary Iranian reformist scholars which emerged partly in response to the doctrine of velāyat-e faqīh, a political-theological theory instigated by Ayatollah Khomeini. Focusing on the ideas of reformist Iranian scholars, such as Abdolkarim Soroush, Muhammad Mujtahed Shabestari, Hasan Yousefi Eshkevari, Mohsen Kadivar and Ahmad Qabel, unpacks these thinkers’ views concerning the doctrine of velāyat-e faqīh. It is argued that these scholars’ criticisms of the doctrine of velāyat-e faqīh are based not only on their interpretations of the Qurʾān and Shiʿa sources, but also philosophical arguments in which notions drawn from the field of hermeneutics are employed. It is also argued that, in challenging the doctrine of velāyat-e faqīh, these scholars question the view that the fuqahā have the exclusive right to rule the country, thereby presenting alternative political theories which criticize efforts to politicize religion.
ISSN:1743-1719
Второстепенные работы:Enthalten in: Political theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/1462317X.2021.2022069