Dignity and the Founding Myth of Bioethics
In this article, I reject the “principlism” of Tom Beauchamp and James Childress and argue that respect for autonomy is, and ought to be, the fundamental value of bioethics. To do so, I offer a reconstruction of what I call the field's “founding myth,” a genealogy that affords primacy to the ri...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2023
|
| In: |
The Hastings Center report
Year: 2023, Volume: 53, Issue: 2, Pages: 26-35 |
| Further subjects: | B
Dignity
B principlism B Bioethics B four principles B Autonomy B Kant |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1843566281 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20241023165807.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230426s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1002/hast.1471 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1843566281 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1843566281 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1345880561 |0 (DE-627)1906669635 |4 aut |a Reis-Dennis, Samuel | |
| 109 | |a Reis-Dennis, Samuel |a Dennis, Samuel Reis- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Dignity and the Founding Myth of Bioethics |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In this article, I reject the “principlism” of Tom Beauchamp and James Childress and argue that respect for autonomy is, and ought to be, the fundamental value of bioethics. To do so, I offer a reconstruction of what I call the field's “founding myth,” a genealogy that affords primacy to the right to be respected as a human being with dignity. Next, I examine the relationship between this basic right and a derivative right of autonomy. I suggest that principlism has promulgated an uncharitable understanding of respect for autonomy, one that ensures that the principle cannot occupy the central position I claim for it. Finally, I sketch a more plausible understanding of respect for autonomy and explore its implications. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Kant | |
| 650 | 4 | |a four principles | |
| 650 | 4 | |a principlism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Autonomy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Dignity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Bioethics | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |a Hastings Center |t The Hastings Center report |d Malden, Mass. : Wiley, 1971 |g 53(2023), 2, Seite 26-35 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)341346551 |w (DE-600)2067369-3 |w (DE-576)258761822 |x 1552-146X |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:53 |g year:2023 |g number:2 |g pages:26-35 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.1471 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/hast.1471 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4314330635 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1843566281 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20241023165807 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 230426||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2023-04-25#1685A3C8A6124A36DEABA3440765BAD8DC107815 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
