How to Deal with Annotations by Different Scribes When Studying and Editing the Masorah
This article tackles the problem posed by presence of annotations written by different scribal hands when studying and editing the masorah. What should we do? Should we ignore the differences between the annotations and merely focus on their content? Starting with a review of how second hands and ot...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
[publisher not identified]
2022
|
| В: |
TC
Год: 2022, Том: 27, Страницы: 85-92 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Издание
/ Masora
/ Пишущий
/ Codex Leningradensis
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | BH Иудаизм HB Ветхий Завет |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Biblia Hebraica Quinta
|
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Итог: | This article tackles the problem posed by presence of annotations written by different scribal hands when studying and editing the masorah. What should we do? Should we ignore the differences between the annotations and merely focus on their content? Starting with a review of how second hands and other paleographic features have been treated in the most recent editions of the masorah from the Leningrad B19a codex, a step-by-step guide on how to include paleographic and other material aspects in the study of the masorah in critical editions (in particular in the Biblia Hebraica Quinta) is presented. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1089-7747 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: TC
|