How to Deal with Annotations by Different Scribes When Studying and Editing the Masorah
This article tackles the problem posed by presence of annotations written by different scribal hands when studying and editing the masorah. What should we do? Should we ignore the differences between the annotations and merely focus on their content? Starting with a review of how second hands and ot...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
[publisher not identified]
2022
|
| Dans: |
TC
Année: 2022, Volume: 27, Pages: 85-92 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Édition
/ Masora
/ Scribe
/ Codex Leningradensis
|
| Classifications IxTheo: | BH Judaïsme HB Ancien Testament |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Biblia Hebraica Quinta
|
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Résumé: | This article tackles the problem posed by presence of annotations written by different scribal hands when studying and editing the masorah. What should we do? Should we ignore the differences between the annotations and merely focus on their content? Starting with a review of how second hands and other paleographic features have been treated in the most recent editions of the masorah from the Leningrad B19a codex, a step-by-step guide on how to include paleographic and other material aspects in the study of the masorah in critical editions (in particular in the Biblia Hebraica Quinta) is presented. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1089-7747 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: TC
|