The impact of religious affiliation on college students’ 12-step model preferences
Previous research has suggested that younger generations are reporting lower levels of religious affiliation and are more likely to drop out of traditional 12-step recovery programmes such as Alcoholics Anonymous than previous generations. The present study examined whether 110 millennial- and Gener...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Contributors: | ; ; ; ; |
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Published: |
2020
|
In: |
Mental health, religion & culture
Year: 2020, Volume: 23, Issue: 3/4, Pages: 317-330 |
Further subjects: | B
Addiction
B Millennial B Religion B 12-step B Generation Z B Recovery |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | Previous research has suggested that younger generations are reporting lower levels of religious affiliation and are more likely to drop out of traditional 12-step recovery programmes such as Alcoholics Anonymous than previous generations. The present study examined whether 110 millennial- and Generation Z-aged, college-students who were assessed for religiosity and substance use patterns preferred the language used in the traditional 12-step model vs. an alternative version of the model that was designed to emphasise personal empowerment over a higher power. Participants who identified as religious displayed a stronger preference for the wording of the traditional 12-step model when compared to the alternative 12-step model, however, all groups preferred the wording of the alternative 12-step model compared to the traditional 12-step wording. These findings suggest that millennial- and Generation Z-aged individuals may have a preference for language and treatment approaches that are less focused on faith and more focused on self-empowerment. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1469-9737 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Mental health, religion & culture
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/13674676.2020.1767553 |