Religion-specific resources for meaning-making from suffering: defining the territory
The purpose of this review paper is to present a case for more proximal and emic approaches to the study of religious meaning-making in suffering. Meaning-making is an important way in which religion and spirituality contribute to adjustment in the context of encountering difficult life events. Howe...
Authors: | ; ; ; ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis
2018
|
In: |
Mental health, religion & culture
Year: 2018, Volume: 21, Issue: 1, Pages: 77-92 |
Further subjects: | B
Diversity
B Suffering B Meaning |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | The purpose of this review paper is to present a case for more proximal and emic approaches to the study of religious meaning-making in suffering. Meaning-making is an important way in which religion and spirituality contribute to adjustment in the context of encountering difficult life events. However, much of the available research on religious meaning-making ignores the contributions of specific religions to the meaning-making process. We begin by presenting a rationale for more sustained attention to religion-specific resources for meaning-making in suffering. Using Park’s meaning-making model as the organising framework, we then articulate how religions contribute unique global beliefs, situational beliefs, meaning-making processes, and valued outcomes to meaning-making. We illustrate these using existing research. Next, we suggest a refinement to Park’s model, offering a preliminary recursive model involving these identified components. We conclude with a brief prospectus informed by our model for future research. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1469-9737 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Mental health, religion & culture
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/13674676.2018.1448770 |