Time Enough for Visions and Revisions: Or Why "Theory" Matters in the Study of Religion
This essay argues that by ignoring the past decade or so of theoretical self-reflection regarding how one best studies "religion,"Stephen Prothero's *God Is Not One* takes us right back to the same ecumenical vista where true religion is by definition never nasty or brutish.
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publié: |
2011
|
| Dans: |
Bulletin for the study of religion
Année: 2011, Volume: 40, Numéro: 2, Pages: 26-29 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Ninian Smart
B Stephen Prothero B Russell McCutcheon |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | This essay argues that by ignoring the past decade or so of theoretical self-reflection regarding how one best studies "religion,"Stephen Prothero's *God Is Not One* takes us right back to the same ecumenical vista where true religion is by definition never nasty or brutish. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2041-1871 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Bulletin for the study of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1558/bsor.v40i2.005 |
