Safeguarding the Unity: The History of the Interpretation of (?) in Genesis 35:7
The present paper examines the classic Jewish exposition of the plural grammatical form related to the Divine in Genesis 35:7. It is situated against Christian exegesis developed in antiquity, the Middle Ages, and the Reformation. The Jewish exegetical tradition offered various interpretations of th...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado em: |
Equinox Publ.
2018
|
| Em: |
Religious studies and theology
Ano: 2018, Volume: 37, Número: 1, Páginas: 22-46 |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
Hebrew Bible
B Trinity B Reformation exegesis B Reformation hermeneutics B Hebrew studies |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Resumo: | The present paper examines the classic Jewish exposition of the plural grammatical form related to the Divine in Genesis 35:7. It is situated against Christian exegesis developed in antiquity, the Middle Ages, and the Reformation. The Jewish exegetical tradition offered various interpretations of the plural form of (?)—which were consistent with the concept of the absolute oneness of the Godhead (fundamental to the Tanakh), and which were rooted in the literary context of Genesis 35:7, and attentive to the grammatical and lexical features of (?) .The plural form in Genesis 35:7 was not detected by either the church fathers or by mainstream Christian exegesis during the Middle Ages. Anti-Jewish medieval literature began adducing Genesis 35:7, among the other passages of this kind, as proof of the presence of the trinitarian idea within the Hebrew Bible. This approach was continued and amplified by Martin Luther in contradistinction to other Reformation exegetes who, generally speaking, preferred to appeal to verses such as Genesis 1:26 or Genesis 3:22 in support of their claims. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1747-5414 |
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Religious studies and theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1558/rsth.31715 |