Understanding nurses’ justification of restraint in a neurosurgical setting: A qualitative interview study
BackgroundDespite its negative impact on patients and nurses, the use of restraint in somatic health care continues in many settings. Understanding the reasons and justifications for the use of restraint among nurses is crucial in order to manage this challenge.AimTo understand nurses’ justification...
| Authors: | ; ; ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sage
2023
|
| In: |
Nursing ethics
Year: 2023, Volume: 30, Issue: 1, Pages: 71-85 |
| Further subjects: | B
Ethics
B Nursing B Restraint B Justification B Autonomy B Neurosurgery |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1833775104 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230209052507.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230209s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/09697330221111447 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1833775104 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1833775104 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Guenna Holmgren, Amina |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Understanding nurses’ justification of restraint in a neurosurgical setting: A qualitative interview study |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a BackgroundDespite its negative impact on patients and nurses, the use of restraint in somatic health care continues in many settings. Understanding the reasons and justifications for the use of restraint among nurses is crucial in order to manage this challenge.AimTo understand nurses’ justifications for restraint use in neurosurgical care.Research designA qualitative, descriptive design was used. Data were analysed with inductive qualitative content analysis.Participants and research contextSemi-structured interviews with 15 nurses working in three neurosurgical departments in Sweden.Ethical considerationsApproved by The Regional Ethics Committee, Stockholm, Sweden.FindingsThe analysis resulted in three categories. The category Patient factors influencing restraint use describes patient factors that trigger restraint, such as a diminished decision-making competence, restlessness, and need for invasive devices. The category Specific reasons for justifying restraint describes reasons for restraining patients, such as restraint being used for the sake of the patient or for the sake of others. The category General reasoning in justifying restraint describes how nurses reason when using restraint, and the decision to use restraint was often based on a consequentialist approach where the nurses’ weighed the pros and cons of different alternatives.DiscussionNurses with experience of restraint use were engaged in a constant process of justifying and balancing different options and actions. Restraint was considered legitimate if the benefit exceeded the suffering, but decisions on which restraint measures to use and when to use them depended on the values of the individual nurse.ConclusionHow nurses reason when justifying restraint, why they use restraint, and who they use restraint on must be considered when creating programs and guidelines to reduce the use of restraint and to ensure that when it is used it is used carefully, appropriately, and with respect. | ||
| 601 | |a Interview | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Nursing | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Autonomy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Restraint | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Neurosurgery | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Justification | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ethics | |
| 700 | 1 | |a von Vogelsang, Ann-Christin |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lindblad, Anna |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Juth, Niklas |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Nursing ethics |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 1994 |g 30(2023), 1, Seite 71-85 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)324869460 |w (DE-600)2031461-9 |w (DE-576)273866605 |x 1477-0989 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:30 |g year:2023 |g number:1 |g pages:71-85 |
| 856 | |u https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/09697330221111447 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via page says license)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330221111447 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 30 |j 2023 |e 1 |h 71-85 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4269214910 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1833775104 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20230209052507 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 230209||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2023-02-08#3B20A847A003820A9E9C666E5DC51FBEE378144E | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||