The Islamic State attacks on Shia holy sites and the “shrine protection narrative”: threats to sacred space as a mobilization frame

After conquering large swaths of Syria and Iraq, the IS undertook an aggressive sectarian campaign in which they not only enacted horrific violence against the Shia people, but also damaged or destroyed several key Shia mosques and shrines. Drawing on Social Movement Theory (SMT), this article analy...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Isakhan, Benjamin 1977- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publié: 2020
Dans: Terrorism and political violence
Année: 2020, Volume: 32, Numéro: 4, Pages: 724-748
Sujets non-standardisés:B Sacred Space
B Islamic State
B Social Movement Theory
B shrine protection
B Shia militias
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (Maison d'édition)
Description
Résumé:After conquering large swaths of Syria and Iraq, the IS undertook an aggressive sectarian campaign in which they not only enacted horrific violence against the Shia people, but also damaged or destroyed several key Shia mosques and shrines. Drawing on Social Movement Theory (SMT), this article analyzes the response by various Shia non-state actors—militia leaders, religious clergymen, populist preachers, and seminal poets. It argues that they used the IS threat to Shia holy sites to develop and deploy a mobilization frame that has come to be referred to as the “shrine protection narrative.” The article also documents the manifold consequences of the shrine protection narrative: it underpinned a mass recruitment drive that saw tens of thousands enlist; it legitimized foreign Shia militias to enter the conflicts in both Syria and Iraq; it justified the formation of entirely new militias who declared the centrality of shrine protection to their mandate; and it mobilized them to enact political violence. In doing so, this article extends existing studies of SMT to demonstrate that “sacred spaces”—and particularly the need to protect religious sites from specific threats—can serve as a powerful mobilization frame towards political violence.
Description:Gesehen am 24.01.2023
Published online: 08 Jan 2018
ISSN:1556-1836
Contient:Enthalten in: Terrorism and political violence
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/09546553.2017.1398741