The Structure and Rhetorical Aim of Deut 4:32–40: The Blending of Historical, Universal, Sensorial and Relational motifs

Deuteronomy 4:32-40 is viewed by various scholars as the climax of Moses’ first speech. While the passage has received considerable discussion on literary-critical front and in terms of its theology, the structure of the passage hasn’t received the same amount of scholarly attention. The reason for...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Coetsee, Albert Johannes (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publié: 2022
Dans: Old Testament essays
Année: 2022, Volume: 35, Numéro: 2, Pages: 211-236
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Mose, Personnage biblique / Relation / Bibel. Deuteronomium 4,32-40
Classifications IxTheo:HB Ancien Testament
HD Judaïsme ancien
Accès en ligne: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Résumé:Deuteronomy 4:32-40 is viewed by various scholars as the climax of Moses’ first speech. While the passage has received considerable discussion on literary-critical front and in terms of its theology, the structure of the passage hasn’t received the same amount of scholarly attention. The reason for the lack of analyses of the structure may be due to the fact that the structure of the passage seems quite simple (Deut 4:32-35, 36-39, 40). The question, however, that has not been adequately addressed, is why Deut 4:36-39 seems to repeat Deut 4:32-35 in part, and what can be deduced from this repetition. The article attempts to answer this question by investigating the occurrence of four primary themes found in the passage, namely historical, universal, sensorial and relational themes, each made up of various motifs. It is argued that the blending of these motifs indicate a deliberate development within the structure of the passage. The article concludes by reflecting on the multifaceted rhetorical aim of the passage in the light of its structure.
ISSN:2312-3621
Contient:Enthalten in: Old Testament essays