Reading Stephen’s Speech as a Counter-Cultural Discourse on Migration and Dislocation

The speech of Stephen in Acts 7:2-53 contains a wealth of references to biblical migration narratives, but their significance for understanding the message of Luke-Acts has been understudied. This is partly due to a recurrent focus on either accusations against Stephen (Acts 6:8-15) or the polemical...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Open theology
Main Author: Hogeterp, Albert L. A. 1973- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: De Gruyter 2021
In: Open theology
Year: 2021, Volume: 7, Issue: 1, Pages: 289-316
Further subjects:B biblical migration narratives
B Ethnicity
B Identity
B patriarchal and Mosaic discourse
B Othering
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:The speech of Stephen in Acts 7:2-53 contains a wealth of references to biblical migration narratives, but their significance for understanding the message of Luke-Acts has been understudied. This is partly due to a recurrent focus on either accusations against Stephen (Acts 6:8-15) or the polemical conclusion of the speech (Acts 7:47-50.51-53). It also partly relates to a teleological interest in early Christian mission narrative. This article reads Stephen’s speech as a counter-cultural discourse on migration and dislocation. It provides a close reading of its biblical story-telling in conjunction with its polemical upshot, and further compares Lucan narrative choices with early Jewish and Jewish Hellenistic literary cycles about patriarchal and Mosaic discourse. It applies a critical lens to the use of ancient narratives of migration and dislocation in discussions about identity, ethnicity, and "othering;" this is of further importance for contemporary identity politics around migration. Through comparing the speech with intra-Jewish dimensions and Graeco-Roman contexts, Stephen emerges as a counter-cultural speaker whose discourse appeals to human-divine intersectionality, specifically regarding the cause of justice for the ill-treated stranger; at the same time, it avoids cultural stereotyping through categories of Hebrews vs Hellenists, Jews vs Christians, Graeco-Roman elite standards vs supposedly "non-European" profiles.
ISSN:2300-6579
Contains:Enthalten in: Open theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1515/opth-2020-0162