On Chickens, Eggs, and the Birthplace of Jesus
In this article, the author challenges the consensus surrounding Jesus’ birth in Bethlehem. This consensus claims the Bethlehem birth was a fabrication posited as messianic fulfilment of Micah 5.2. First, the author summarises the majority position on the issue. Second, the author problematises the...
| Subtitles: | Special Issue: Mary Magdalene and Film |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2022
|
| In: |
Journal for the study of the historical Jesus
Year: 2022, Volume: 20, Issue: 3, Pages: 218-238 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Jesus Christus
/ Luke
/ Matthew
/ Jesus Christ, Birth
/ Bible. Micha 5,2
/ Bethlehem
|
| IxTheo Classification: | HC New Testament KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | In this article, the author challenges the consensus surrounding Jesus’ birth in Bethlehem. This consensus claims the Bethlehem birth was a fabrication posited as messianic fulfilment of Micah 5.2. First, the author summarises the majority position on the issue. Second, the author problematises the notion that there was an expectation regarding Bethlehem as messianic birthplace. Third, the author claims the available evidence might equally suggest Jesus was born in Bethlehem, with Micah 5.2 reinterpreted in light of this. As such, the author calls for renewed discussion about Jesus’ birthplace, and the nature of scholarly argumentation surrounding the issue. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1745-5197 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the historical Jesus
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/17455197-bja10012 |