Research Ethics and Justice: The Case of Finland
This paper explores how Finnish research ethics deals with matters of justice on the levels of practical regulation, political morality, and theoretical studies. The bioethical sets of principles introduced by Tom Beauchamp and James Childress in the United States and Jacob Dahl Rendtorff and Peter...
Authors: | ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2019
|
In: |
Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Year: 2019, Volume: 28, Issue: 3, Pages: 551-576 |
Further subjects: | B
Justice
B Beneficence B Bioethics B Vulnerability B Solidarity B Responsibility B research ethics B precaution B Dignity B Welfare State B Consent B Finland B Autonomy B Nonmaleficence B Integrity B Subsidiarity |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | This paper explores how Finnish research ethics deals with matters of justice on the levels of practical regulation, political morality, and theoretical studies. The bioethical sets of principles introduced by Tom Beauchamp and James Childress in the United States and Jacob Dahl Rendtorff and Peter Kemp in Europe provide the conceptual background, together with a recently introduced conceptual map of theories of justice and their dimensions. The most striking finding is that the internationally recognized requirement of informed consent for research on humans can be ideologically tricky in a Scandinavian welfare state setting. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1469-2147 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0963180119000471 |