The Moral Superiority of Bioengineered Wombs and Ectogenesis for Absolute Uterine Factor Infertility

This paper argues that uterine transplants are a potentially dangerous distraction from the development of alternative methods of providing reproductive options for women with absolute uterine factor infertility (AUFI). We consider two alternatives in particular: the bioengineering of wombs using st...

Полное описание

Сохранить в:  
Библиографические подробности
Главные авторы: Kendal, Evie (Автор) ; Koplin, Julian J. (Автор)
Формат: Электронный ресурс Статья
Язык:Английский
Проверить наличие: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Опубликовано: 2022
В: Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Год: 2022, Том: 31, Выпуск: 1, Страницы: 73-82
Другие ключевые слова:B ectogenesis
B artificial womb
B uterus transplant
B transplant ethics
B UTx
B bioengineered womb
B pronatalism
B reproductive liberty
Online-ссылка: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Описание
Итог:This paper argues that uterine transplants are a potentially dangerous distraction from the development of alternative methods of providing reproductive options for women with absolute uterine factor infertility (AUFI). We consider two alternatives in particular: the bioengineering of wombs using stem cells (which would carry fewer risks than uterine transplants) and ectogenesis (which would not require surgical intervention for either the prospective mother with AUFI or a womb donor). Whether biologically or mechanically engineered, these womb replacements could provide a way for women to have children, including genetically related offspring for those who would value this possibility. Most importantly, this alternative would avoid the challenge of sourcing wombs for transplant, a practice that we argue would likely be exploitative and unethical. Continued research into bioengineering and ectogenesis will therefore remain morally important despite the recent development of uterine transplantation, even if the procedure reaches routine clinical application.
ISSN:1469-2147
Второстепенные работы:Enthalten in: Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S0963180121000827