Resuscitating Patient Rights during the Pandemic: COVID-19 and the Risk of Resurgent Paternalism
The COVID-19 Pandemic a stress test for clinical medicine and medical ethics, with a confluence over questions of the proportionality of resuscitation. Drawing upon his experience as a clinical ethicist during the surge in New York City during the Spring of 2020, the author considers how attitudes r...
Autore principale: | |
---|---|
Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
Lingua: | Inglese |
Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Pubblicazione: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2021
|
In: |
Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Anno: 2021, Volume: 30, Fascicolo: 2, Pagine: 215-221 |
Altre parole chiave: | B
History of Medicine
B Paternalism B Covid-19 B Patient Rights B Medical Ethics B DNR B Resuscitation |
Accesso online: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
Riepilogo: | The COVID-19 Pandemic a stress test for clinical medicine and medical ethics, with a confluence over questions of the proportionality of resuscitation. Drawing upon his experience as a clinical ethicist during the surge in New York City during the Spring of 2020, the author considers how attitudes regarding resuscitation have evolved since the inception of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders decades ago. Sharing a personal narrative about a DNR quandry he encountered as a medical intern, the author considers the balance of patient rights versus clinical discretion, warning about the risk of resurgent physician paternalism dressed up in the guise of a public health crisis. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1469-2147 |
Comprende: | Enthalten in: Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0963180120000535 |