Reading Reinhold Niebuhr Against Himself
Reinhold Niebuhr's critics rightly identify flaws in his anthropology, but err in assuming those flaws irreparably vitiate his larger proposal. In fact Niebuhr's work contains two different anthropologies, one problematically
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Society of Christian Ethics
1999
|
In: |
The annual of the Society of Christian Ethics
Year: 1999, Volume: 19, Pages: 69-94 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | Reinhold Niebuhr's critics rightly identify flaws in his anthropology, but err in assuming those flaws irreparably vitiate his larger proposal. In fact Niebuhr's work contains two different anthropologies, one problematically |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2372-9023 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Society of Christian Ethics, The annual of the Society of Christian Ethics
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5840/asce1999195 |