The Role of Physicians in the Allocation of Health Care: Is Some Justice Better than None?

, ABSTRACT:, Physicians’ advocacy obligations are best understood as going beyond advocacy on behalf of individual patients, which I call the “individualistic view,” to include advocacy for intelligent research-based allocation schemes that promote good outcomes and cost-effective care for all patie...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Glover, Jacqueline (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press 2019
In: Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal
Year: 2019, Volume: 29, Issue: 1, Pages: 1-31
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:, ABSTRACT:, Physicians’ advocacy obligations are best understood as going beyond advocacy on behalf of individual patients, which I call the “individualistic view,” to include advocacy for intelligent research-based allocation schemes that promote good outcomes and cost-effective care for all patients, which I call the “systemic view.” This systemic view includes moving beyond self-interest to promote less-wasteful and more cost-conscious allocation decisions and the setting of priorities at all levels to expand health care access. It includes physician involvement in discussions with patients in the context of clinical care, involvement in the formulation and administration of benefit structures and other allocation policies, and, finally, involvement in promoting public dialogue about health care priorities. This involvement is based on a concept of a deliberative process that can result in “just enough” decisions within systems for the preservation and promotion of health care and other societal goods.
ISSN:1086-3249
Contains:Enthalten in: Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1353/ken.2019.0008