Beneficence, Justice, and Health Care
This paper argues that societal duties of health promotion are under-written (at least in large part) by a principle of beneficence. Further, this principle generates duties of justice that correlate with rights, not merely “imperfect” duties of charity or generosity. To support this argument, I dra...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
2014
|
In: |
Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal
Year: 2014, Volume: 24, Issue: 1, Pages: 27-49 |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | This paper argues that societal duties of health promotion are under-written (at least in large part) by a principle of beneficence. Further, this principle generates duties of justice that correlate with rights, not merely “imperfect” duties of charity or generosity. To support this argument, I draw on a useful distinction from bioethics and on a somewhat neglected approach to social obligation from political philosophy. The distinction is that between general and specific beneficence; and the approach from political philosophy has at times been called equality of concern. After clarifying the distinction and setting out the basis of the equality of concern view, I argue that the result is a justice-based principle of “specific” beneficence that should be reflected in a society’s health policy. I then draw on this account to criticize, refine, and extend some prominent health care policy proposals from the bioethics literature. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1086-3249 |
Reference: | Errata "Errata (2014)"
|
Contains: | Enthalten in: Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1353/ken.2014.0004 |