Do the ends justify the means?: variation in the distributive and procedural fairness of machine learning algorithms

Recent advances in machine learning methods have created opportunities to eliminate unfairness from algorithmic decision making. Multiple computational techniques (i.e., algorithmic fairness criteria) have arisen out of this work. Yet, urgent questions remain about the perceived fairness of these cr...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Morse, Lily (Author) ; Teodorescu, Mike Horia M. (Author) ; Awwad, Yazeed (Author) ; Kane, Gerald C. ca. 20. Jh. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2022
In: Journal of business ethics
Year: 2022, Volume: 181, Issue: 4, Pages: 1083-1095
Further subjects:B Distributive fairness
B Procedural Fairness
B Fair play
B Aufsatz in Zeitschrift
B Algorithm design
B machine learning
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 4500
001 1826775838
003 DE-627
005 20230331054419.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221212s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10551-021-04939-5  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1826775838 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1826775838 
035 |a (DE-He213)s10551-021-04939-5-e 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Morse, Lily  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Do the ends justify the means?  |b variation in the distributive and procedural fairness of machine learning algorithms  |c Lily Morse, Mike Horia M. Teodorescu, Yazeed Awwad, Gerald C. Kane 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Recent advances in machine learning methods have created opportunities to eliminate unfairness from algorithmic decision making. Multiple computational techniques (i.e., algorithmic fairness criteria) have arisen out of this work. Yet, urgent questions remain about the perceived fairness of these criteria and in which situations organizations should use them. In this paper, we seek to gain insight into these questions by exploring fairness perceptions of five algorithmic criteria. We focus on two key dimensions of fairness evaluations: distributive fairness and procedural fairness. We shed light on variation in the potential for different algorithmic criteria to facilitate distributive fairness. Subsequently, we discuss procedural fairness and provide a framework for understanding how algorithmic criteria relate to essential aspects of this construct, which helps to identify when a specific criterion is suitable. From a practical standpoint, we encourage organizations to recognize that managing fairness in machine learning systems is complex, and that adopting a blind or one-size-fits-all mentality toward algorithmic criteria will surely damage people’s attitudes and trust in automated technology. Instead, firms should carefully consider the subtle yet significant differences between these technical solutions. 
601 |a Distribution 
650 4 |a Algorithm design 
650 4 |a Distributive fairness 
650 4 |a Fairness 
650 4 |a machine learning 
650 4 |a Procedural Fairness 
655 4 |0 (DE-206)49  |a Aufsatz in Zeitschrift  |5 DE-206 
700 1 |a Teodorescu, Mike Horia M.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Awwad, Yazeed  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)119313367X  |0 (DE-627)1671747216  |4 aut  |a Kane, Gerald C.  |d ca. 20. Jh. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of business ethics  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1982  |g 181(2022), 4 vom: Dez., Seite 1083-1095  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)270937129  |w (DE-600)1478688-6  |w (DE-576)121465284  |x 1573-0697  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:181  |g year:2022  |g number:4  |g month:12  |g pages:1083-1095 
856 |u https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/1721.1/146834/1/10551_2021_4939_ReferencePDF.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH doi match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10551-021-04939-5.pdf?pdf=button  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04939-5  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 181  |j 2022  |e 4  |c 12  |h 1083-1095 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4229034792 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1826775838 
LOK |0 005 20221212101839 
LOK |0 008 221212||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
STA 0 0 |a Fair play 
STB 0 0 |a Équité,Fairplay,impartialité,Fairplay,impartialité 
STC 0 0 |a Justicia,Fairness,Fairness 
STD 0 0 |a Correttezza 
STE 0 0 |a 公平,公正 
STF 0 0 |a 公平,公正 
STG 0 0 |a Justiça,Fairness,Fairness 
STH 0 0 |a Справедливость 
STI 0 0 |a Δικαιοσύνη,Fair play,Ευ αγωνίζεσθαι,Ίση μεταχείριση 
SYE 0 0 |a Fair play