Winning the battle but losing the war: ironic effects of training consumers to detect deceptive advertising tactics

Misleading information pervades marketing communications, and is a long-standing issue in business ethics. Regulators place a heavy burden on consumers to detect misleading information, and a number of studies have shown training can improve their ability to do so. However, the possible side effects...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Wilson, Andrew E. (Author) ; Darke, Peter R. (Author) ; Sengupta, Jaideep (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer 2022
In: Journal of business ethics
Year: 2022, Volume: 181, Issue: 4, Pages: 997-1013
Further subjects:B Deceptive advertising
B Goal systems theory
B Deception
B Persuasion knowledge model
B Aufsatz in Zeitschrift
B Consumer training
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:Misleading information pervades marketing communications, and is a long-standing issue in business ethics. Regulators place a heavy burden on consumers to detect misleading information, and a number of studies have shown training can improve their ability to do so. However, the possible side effects have largely gone unexamined. We provide evidence for one such side-effect, whereby training consumers to detect a specific tactic (illegitimate endorsers), leaves them more vulnerable to a second tactic included in the same ad (a restrictive qualifying footnote), relative to untrained controls. We update standard notions of persuasion knowledge using a goal systems approach that allows for multiple vigilance goals to explain such side-effects in terms of goal shielding, which is a generally adaptive process by which activation and/or fulfillment of a low-level goal inhibits alternative detection goals. Furthermore, the same goal systems logic is used to develop a more general form of training that activates a higher-level goal (general skepticism). This more general training improved detection of a broader set of tactics without the negative goal shielding side effect.
ISSN:1573-0697
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal of business ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s10551-021-04937-7