Why without excuse?
This study aims at ascertaining what can be inferred from the linguistic evidence about what Romans 1:20 “said” within its primary context, viz. as part of the introduction to Paul’s letter. Due to the controversies that the interpretation of this verse has caused, a critical assessment of various t...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
NTWSA
2005
|
| In: |
Neotestamentica
Year: 2005, Volume: 39, Issue: 2, Pages: 389-407 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | This study aims at ascertaining what can be inferred from the linguistic evidence about what Romans 1:20 “said” within its primary context, viz. as part of the introduction to Paul’s letter. Due to the controversies that the interpretation of this verse has caused, a critical assessment of various translations and commentaries is given before proposing and motivating an alternative interpretation of νοούμενα and its syntactic and semantic relations to the rest of the sentence and the pericope. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2518-4628 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Neotestamentica
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.10520/EJC83200 |