Buried shamefully
Historical reconstruction of the event of Jesus' burial needs to take into account the archaeological, socio-political and literary evidence. This essay presents and evaluates J. D. Crossan's interpretation of the evidence and his conclusions regarding a non-burial for Jesus. The counter-a...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
NTWSA
2011
|
| In: |
Neotestamentica
Year: 2011, Volume: 45, Issue: 1, Pages: 115-129 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | Historical reconstruction of the event of Jesus' burial needs to take into account the archaeological, socio-political and literary evidence. This essay presents and evaluates J. D. Crossan's interpretation of the evidence and his conclusions regarding a non-burial for Jesus. The counter-argument of B. R. McCane is outlined next. With McCane, this essay concludes that a case can be made for an actual burial of Jesus, be it a dishonourable one. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2518-4628 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Neotestamentica
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.10520/EJC83410 |