Historiography and Hermeneutics in Jesus Studies
John Dominic Crossan is the culmination of one specific methodological tradition in Jesus research, which is characterised by a rigorous handling of the date, by subjecting individual units of tradition to examination as a first step of historical investigation. Ben F. Meyer represents the trend in...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Review |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
NTWSA
2006
|
| In: |
Neotestamentica
Year: 2006, Volume: 40, Issue: 1, Pages: 193-195 |
| Further subjects: | B
Book review
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | John Dominic Crossan is the culmination of one specific methodological tradition in Jesus research, which is characterised by a rigorous handling of the date, by subjecting individual units of tradition to examination as a first step of historical investigation. Ben F. Meyer represents the trend in historiography where data are scrutinised for their historicity, not as individual units but as functional parts of a larger picture of which the historian’s hypothesis forms the framework of interpretation. Their work form the basis for the analysis in this study. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2518-4628 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Neotestamentica
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.10520/EJC83221 |