Historiography and Hermeneutics in Jesus Studies
John Dominic Crossan is the culmination of one specific methodological tradition in Jesus research, which is characterised by a rigorous handling of the date, by subjecting individual units of tradition to examination as a first step of historical investigation. Ben F. Meyer represents the trend in...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Review |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
NTWSA
2006
|
In: |
Neotestamentica
Year: 2006, Volume: 40, Issue: 1, Pages: 193-195 |
Further subjects: | B
Book review
|
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | John Dominic Crossan is the culmination of one specific methodological tradition in Jesus research, which is characterised by a rigorous handling of the date, by subjecting individual units of tradition to examination as a first step of historical investigation. Ben F. Meyer represents the trend in historiography where data are scrutinised for their historicity, not as individual units but as functional parts of a larger picture of which the historian’s hypothesis forms the framework of interpretation. Their work form the basis for the analysis in this study. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2518-4628 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Neotestamentica
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.10520/EJC83221 |