The Pharisaic roots of Jesus and the early church
Some of the views of Jesus and Paul can be explained against the background of the schools of Hillel and Shammai of the first century AD. In the attitude of Bet Hillel to the Gentiles the greatest affinity emerges. The controversy between Paul and the Judaizers is explicable against the background o...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
NTWSA
1987
|
| In: |
Neotestamentica
Year: 1987, Volume: 21, Issue: 2, Pages: 113-124 |
| Further subjects: | B
Theology
B School of Hillel B Religion of ancient Israel B Teachings of Jesus Christ B Church History B Christianity B Jesus Christ B Theology of Paul the Apostle B School of Shammai B Pharisees |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
| Summary: | Some of the views of Jesus and Paul can be explained against the background of the schools of Hillel and Shammai of the first century AD. In the attitude of Bet Hillel to the Gentiles the greatest affinity emerges. The controversy between Paul and the Judaizers is explicable against the background of this distinction: Paul (Bet Hillel) is opposed to the Judaizers (Bet Shammai). In handing down the accounts of Jesus through the decades, Jesus' disputes with Bet Shammai tended to be presented as controversies directed against the Pharisees in general by the early Christians, because of their own situations of opposition. In this perspective the Jewish roots of Christianity emerges far more clearly. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2518-4628 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Neotestamentica
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.10520/AJA2548356_783 |