The unity of 2 Corinthians
The fragmentary hypothesis in the case of 2 Corinthians is founded upon a particular and problematic notion of communicative dynamics. However, rhetorical practice allows for complexity in intentionality, audiences, topoi, pathos and dispositio. Consequently, a. 're-discovered and re-invented r...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
1999
|
| In: |
Neotestamentica
Year: 1999, Volume: 33, Issue: 2, Pages: 411-431 |
| Further subjects: | B
Theology
B 2 Corinthians B Methods of argumentation B Christianity B Rhetorical units |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | The fragmentary hypothesis in the case of 2 Corinthians is founded upon a particular and problematic notion of communicative dynamics. However, rhetorical practice allows for complexity in intentionality, audiences, topoi, pathos and dispositio. Consequently, a. 're-discovered and re-invented rhetoric is proposed which offers a model which can make sense of the complexity of the argumentation within the letter without having to pose a complex solution of multiple, individual sources later pieced together. Argumentational development and multiple inventional trajectories can explain the dynamics of the correspondence as a whole. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2518-4628 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Neotestamentica
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.10520/AJA2548356_554 |