Reading Dreams

In the introduction of this monograph that originated as a Ph.D. dissertation at Baylor University, the author captures the reader's curiosity, by stating: "The primary understanding of dreams in antiquity was that dreams represent some objective experience that connected humanity with the...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mollett, Margaret (Author)
Format: Electronic Review
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: NTWSA 2013
In: Neotestamentica
Year: 2013, Volume: 47, Issue: 2, Pages: 404-408
Further subjects:B Book review
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:In the introduction of this monograph that originated as a Ph.D. dissertation at Baylor University, the author captures the reader's curiosity, by stating: "The primary understanding of dreams in antiquity was that dreams represent some objective experience that connected humanity with the will of the divine. Ancients did not have dreams. They were encountered by dreams." According to Patricia Cox Miller, whom he cites, "Dreams were autonomous; they were not conceptualized as products of a personal sub- or unconscious but rather as visual images that present themselves to the dreamer" (1). Dodson thus concludes that ancient dreams had a socio-religious dimension which in turn influenced the literary representation of dreams in antiquity.
ISSN:2518-4628
Contains:Enthalten in: Neotestamentica
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.10520/EJC148901