Del paradigma codicial al paradigma constitucional

The law-centered or code-centered focus has given way to the età dei diritti, shaped by the revival of natural law after the Second World War. In theory, the law has not been at the center of canon law because of the undeniable validity of the ius divinum, although the code-focused paradigm has give...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Castro-Trapote, Jorge (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:Spanish
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: HeinOnline 2022
In: Ius canonicum
Year: 2022, Volume: 62, Issue: 124, Pages: 665-723
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Canon law / Understanding of law / Legal realism / Law / Voluntarism
IxTheo Classification:SB Catholic Church law
Further subjects:B Derecho divino
B Derechos fundamentales
B Paradigma constitucional
B iusrealismo-iusvoluntarismo
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:The law-centered or code-centered focus has given way to the età dei diritti, shaped by the revival of natural law after the Second World War. In theory, the law has not been at the center of canon law because of the undeniable validity of the ius divinum, although the code-focused paradigm has given rise to a canonical experience that depends almost exclusively on the legal text. Setting aside theoretical canonizatio, the code-centered paradigm has brought about a certain practical canonizatio in the juridical life of the Church. The age of rights transformed constitutionalism in the second half of the 20th century, yielding a more nuanced account of so-called paleopositivism and leading to iusmoralism, and blurring the boundary between iusnaturalism and iuspositivism. In order to clarify these questions, we turn to a fundamental debate that has conditioned the history of law and canon law up to the present day: iusvoluntarism or iusrealism. After examining some insufficient paradigms and their origins in canon law, the author points to the constitutional paradigm as the most appropriate for channeling and continuing the canonical tradition and the mission of the Church.
ISSN:2254-6219
Contains:Enthalten in: Ius canonicum
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.15581/016.124.001