Scotus' Departure from Anselm's Theory of the Atonement
In the first part of this paper, I analyze Anselm's attempt in Cur Deus Homo to justify the Atonement by showing that his discussion can be organized around three principles: satisfaction, symmetry, and ransom. In the second part, I explore Scotus' comments on the philosophical puzzles of...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Peeters
1983
|
In: |
Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale
Year: 1983, Volume: 50, Pages: 227-241 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
Summary: | In the first part of this paper, I analyze Anselm's attempt in Cur Deus Homo to justify the Atonement by showing that his discussion can be organized around three principles: satisfaction, symmetry, and ransom. In the second part, I explore Scotus' comments on the philosophical puzzles of the Incarnation and Atonement. I emphasize that his analysis of the hypostatic union causes him to regard Christ's sacrifice as finite and not intrinsically salvific for mankind. In the third part, I argue that Scotus' emphasis on the finite nature of Christ's sacrifice is a rejection of Anselm's principle of symmetry. Moreover, I claim that, as a voluntarist, Scotus also rejects Anselm's principle as restricting God's free choice. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2593-2896 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale
|