Stakeholder Judgments of Value
Although central to stakeholder theory, stakeholder value is surprisingly neglected in the literature. We draw upon prospect theory to show how stakeholder judgments of value depend crucially on the reference state, how there are several alternative reference states that may be operative when stakeh...
Autore principale: | |
---|---|
Altri autori: | ; |
Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
Lingua: | Inglese |
Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Pubblicazione: |
2016
|
In: |
Business ethics quarterly
Anno: 2016, Volume: 26, Fascicolo: 2, Pagine: 227-256 |
Altre parole chiave: | B
Normative Business Ethics
B Reference States B Stakeholder Judgments B Stakeholder Theory B Stakeholder Value B Prospect Theory |
Accesso online: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Riepilogo: | Although central to stakeholder theory, stakeholder value is surprisingly neglected in the literature. We draw upon prospect theory to show how stakeholder judgments of value depend crucially on the reference state, how there are several alternative reference states that may be operative when stakeholders judge value, how the choice of reference state for stakeholders’ value judgments can occur intuitively or deliberately, and how the level of the operant reference state may change with time and may also be incorrectly perceived by stakeholders or managers. Our theorizing results in a fundamentally different way of perceiving the value of corporate actions to stakeholders and shifts understanding of the avenues available for companies and others to influence stakeholder judgments of value. This novel perspective has implications both for theory and management practice, and not least for normative business ethics, if business is about stakeholder value creation. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2153-3326 |
Comprende: | Enthalten in: Business ethics quarterly
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/beq.2016.28 |