Animals, Ethics, and Process Thought: Hierarchy without Anthroparchy (A Response to Combs, Donaldson, and Sinclair)
In the present article the other articles in this Special Focus section on Process Thought and Animals are criticized. Both the strengths and weaknesses of the articles by Combs, Donaldson, and Sinclair are detailed. Whitehead’s non-invidious hierarchy is defended.
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
University of Illinois Press
2013
|
| In: |
Process studies
Year: 2013, Volume: 42, Issue: 2, Pages: 221-239 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | In the present article the other articles in this Special Focus section on Process Thought and Animals are criticized. Both the strengths and weaknesses of the articles by Combs, Donaldson, and Sinclair are detailed. Whitehead’s non-invidious hierarchy is defended. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2154-3682 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Process studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.2307/44798744 |