The Q-Recension Hypothesis some Reflections in Dialogue with Ulrich Luz
The essay is a revised version of a paper that was read at the SBL Annual Meeting in Atlanta in 2003, to which Ulrich Luz gave a response. It discusses the Q-recension hypothesis, which was suggested already in the mid-19th century by C. Weizsäcker, but picked up by only a few scholars, until U. Luz...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publié: |
2017
|
| Dans: |
Sacra scripta
Année: 2017, Volume: 15, Numéro: 1/2, Pages: 193-210 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Synoptic Problem
B Sayings Source Q B History of exegesis |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | The essay is a revised version of a paper that was read at the SBL Annual Meeting in Atlanta in 2003, to which Ulrich Luz gave a response. It discusses the Q-recension hypothesis, which was suggested already in the mid-19th century by C. Weizsäcker, but picked up by only a few scholars, until U. Luz gave it more prominence and a wider readership in his influential commentary on Matthew. The essay is divided into three parts that deal, in a critical way, with the problems in defining and delineating the recensions used by Matthew and by Luke, the criteria that should be met for demonstrating the existence of Q recensions, and the benefits that can possibly be gained from it according to its adepts. |
|---|---|
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Universitatea Babeş-Bolyai. Centrul de Studii Biblice, Sacra scripta
|
