Responding to Debunking Arguments: A Reply to Lari Launonen’s Critique

In this response article, I argue that Launonen’s criticisms either are beyond the scope of my argument in chapter 5 of Arguing from Cognitive Science of Religion or wrongfully presume that evolutionary explanations exhaustively explain religious beliefs. I also criticize Launonen’s claim that argum...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Eyghen, Hans Van (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2022
In: Philosophia reformata
Year: 2022, Volume: 87, Issue: 2, Pages: 195-207
Further subjects:B justification of religious belief
B Religious Epistemology
B cognitive science of religion
B debunking arguments
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1823573398
003 DE-627
005 20221125052553.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221125s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/23528230-bja10046  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1823573398 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1823573398 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Eyghen, Hans Van  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Responding to Debunking Arguments: A Reply to Lari Launonen’s Critique 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In this response article, I argue that Launonen’s criticisms either are beyond the scope of my argument in chapter 5 of Arguing from Cognitive Science of Religion or wrongfully presume that evolutionary explanations exhaustively explain religious beliefs. I also criticize Launonen’s claim that arguments in terms of divine design are preferable to arguments in terms of truth-tracking cognitive mechanisms. 
601 |a Argumentation 
650 4 |a justification of religious belief 
650 4 |a cognitive science of religion 
650 4 |a debunking arguments 
650 4 |a Religious Epistemology 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Philosophia reformata  |d Leiden : Brill, 1936  |g 87(2022), 2, Seite 195-207  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)618327223  |w (DE-600)2537669-X  |w (DE-576)354444204  |x 2352-8230  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:87  |g year:2022  |g number:2  |g pages:195-207 
856 |u https://brill.com/downloadpdf/journals/phir/aop/article-10.1163-23528230-bja10046/article-10.1163-23528230-bja10046.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via page says license)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/23528230-bja10046  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/view/journals/phir/87/2/article-p195_004.xml  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4219261559 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1823573398 
LOK |0 005 20221125052553 
LOK |0 008 221125||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-24#A67B24463DA76D2C6051C24D2959943F76F3E863 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw