Albert le grand commentateur de la théologie mystique de Denys
Albert the Great’s Commentary on Dionysius’ Mystical Theology seems almost as mysterious as its model, in view of the intention governing such a reading. This all the more so given that Thomas Aquinas, Albert’s disciple in the study of Dionysius, wrote no such commentary. What is Albert’s purpose, a...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | French |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
2006
|
| In: |
Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques
Year: 2006, Volume: 90, Issue: 2, Pages: 225-271 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | Albert the Great’s Commentary on Dionysius’ Mystical Theology seems almost as mysterious as its model, in view of the intention governing such a reading. This all the more so given that Thomas Aquinas, Albert’s disciple in the study of Dionysius, wrote no such commentary. What is Albert’s purpose, and above all, what is that of the idea of negation that he takes up? RésuméLe Commentaire de la Théologie mystique de Denys d’Albert le Grand semble presque aussi mystérieux que son modèle, eu égard à l’intention présidant à une telle lecture. Cela, d’autant que Thomas d’Aquin, disciple d’Albert ès études dionysiennes, n’a pas écrit un tel commentaire. Quelle est l’intention d’Albert et surtout l’idée de la négation qu’il met en œuvre? |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2118-4445 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.3917/rspt.902.0225 |