Romains 4 et Genèse 17. Quelle énigme et quelle solution?
The article is an attempt to show that, thanks to the two citations of Gn 15,6 and Ps 31[32],1-2 in Rm 4,2.7-8, Paul gives his opinion indirectly but nevertheless clearly on the injunctions of Gen 17,10-14. Those citations form a gezerah shawah (= GS), which goes along with the standards of the tech...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | French |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Peeters
2003
|
| In: |
Biblica
Year: 2003, Volume: 84, Issue: 3, Pages: 305-325 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
| Summary: | The article is an attempt to show that, thanks to the two citations of Gn 15,6 and Ps 31[32],1-2 in Rm 4,2.7-8, Paul gives his opinion indirectly but nevertheless clearly on the injunctions of Gen 17,10-14. Those citations form a gezerah shawah (= GS), which goes along with the standards of the technique fixed by the rabbis later on and allows Paul to interpret the role of the circumcision in Gn 17,10-14 originally and paradoxically. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2385-2062 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Biblica
|