Chronistic Tendency in 1 Chr 18,10-11
The omission of wyh wdybw and the addition of lkw in 1 Chr 18,10 are deliberate. The last part of v. 10 now connects with v. 11 and refers to the spoil of Hadadezer instead of to the gift of King Toi. This interpretation is confirmed by three other Chronistic changes in v. 11.
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Peeters
1999
|
| In: |
Biblica
Year: 1999, Volume: 80, Issue: 2, Pages: 269-271 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
| Summary: | The omission of wyh wdybw and the addition of lkw in 1 Chr 18,10 are deliberate. The last part of v. 10 now connects with v. 11 and refers to the spoil of Hadadezer instead of to the gift of King Toi. This interpretation is confirmed by three other Chronistic changes in v. 11. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2385-2062 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Biblica
|