Three Debates about Bible and Archaeology

Three significant debates affecting perceptions of Israelite history, the Bible’s historiography, the relationship between this historiography and archaeology, and the dating of parts of the Bible’s literature have occupied Biblicists and archaeologists for the last 25 years. This article distinguis...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zevit, Ziony (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Peeters 2002
In: Biblica
Year: 2002, Volume: 83, Issue: 1, Pages: 1-27
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic
Description
Summary:Three significant debates affecting perceptions of Israelite history, the Bible’s historiography, the relationship between this historiography and archaeology, and the dating of parts of the Bible’s literature have occupied Biblicists and archaeologists for the last 25 years. This article distinguishes the debates by analyzing the issues involved, the terminologies employed, as well as the professions of the protagonists engaged in each. It considers each within its own intellectual context. In light of these analyses, the article proposes a positive assessment of the contribution of these debates to the study ancient Israel’s history.
ISSN:2385-2062
Contains:Enthalten in: Biblica