Religious Orientation, Sex-Role Traditionalism, and Gender Identity: Contrasting Male and Female Responses to Socializing Forces
A sample of 106 undergraduates in a small liberal arts prairie college completed a survey that contained measures of their conformity to traditional gender-role concepts, their gender identity (the Bern Sex-Role Inventory or BSRl), and their religious orientation — including affiliation, strength of...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
[publisher not identified]
1990
|
| In: |
Sociological analysis
Year: 1990, Volume: 51, Issue: 4, Pages: 377-385 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
| Summary: | A sample of 106 undergraduates in a small liberal arts prairie college completed a survey that contained measures of their conformity to traditional gender-role concepts, their gender identity (the Bern Sex-Role Inventory or BSRl), and their religious orientation — including affiliation, strength of belief, and frequency of church attendance. The general findings are that (1) socialization factors do influence gender identity; (2) gender identity influences sex-role traditionalism (in females only) and religiosity (in males only); but (3) these influences are independent of one another. A major finding is the difference between male and female behavioral responses to the influence of religious socialization, a result which is consistent with the Dual Spheres/Dual Pathways model of male/female consciousness. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2325-7873 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Sociological analysis
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.2307/3711078 |