A Critical Rejoinder to “Empirical Taxonomy of Religious Individual: An Investigation among College Students”
Filsinger, Faulkner, and Warland's (1979) claim of empirical validity for their taxonomy of religious individuals is evaluated in light of further post hoc analyses of their data. The results of these post hoc analyses indicate that their taxonomy of religious individuals has not been empirical...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Contributors: | |
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Published: |
1980
|
In: |
Sociological analysis
Year: 1980, Volume: 41, Issue: 3, Pages: 265-267 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | Filsinger, Faulkner, and Warland's (1979) claim of empirical validity for their taxonomy of religious individuals is evaluated in light of further post hoc analyses of their data. The results of these post hoc analyses indicate that their taxonomy of religious individuals has not been empirically validated. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2325-7873 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Sociological analysis
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.2307/3710403 |