Abschaffung der Tora bei Gesetzeskennern?: Beobachtungen an und zu Röm 7,1-6

Rom 7,1-6 is much disputed, especially the meaning of 'law'. Should it be understood as law in general or as 'Torah'? Is it esteemed as abolished by Christ? What about 'freedom from law' (see v. 3)? The exegetical disagreements (I.), the ambiguities of the passage (II.)...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bachmann, Michael 1946- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:German
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Peeters 2022
In: Biblica
Year: 2022, Volume: 103, Issue: 2, Pages: 254-268
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:Rom 7,1-6 is much disputed, especially the meaning of 'law'. Should it be understood as law in general or as 'Torah'? Is it esteemed as abolished by Christ? What about 'freedom from law' (see v. 3)? The exegetical disagreements (I.), the ambiguities of the passage (II.) and its structure (III.) are considered. The passage connects a marriage-rule with the relationship(s) of the addressees to the dying and resurrected Christ — within an ethical perspective (IV., V.). Result: It is thought of as Torah, which means that the ethical content of the law has not been given up on the basis of the Christ-event (VI.).
ISSN:2385-2062
Contains:Enthalten in: Biblica
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.2143/BIB.103.2.3290914