Thomas, Scotus, and Ockham on the Object of Hope
There is clear disagreement between Thomas Aquinas, John Duns Scotus, and William of Ockham over the way in which habits and acts are specified. This disagreement can perhaps most clearly be seen in the different ways in which they describe the virtue of hope’s object. Thomas himself gives accounts...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Peeters
2020
|
| In: |
Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales
Year: 2020, Volume: 87, Issue: 1, Pages: 1-26 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
| Summary: | There is clear disagreement between Thomas Aquinas, John Duns Scotus, and William of Ockham over the way in which habits and acts are specified. This disagreement can perhaps most clearly be seen in the different ways in which they describe the virtue of hope’s object. Thomas himself gives accounts that diverge at least verbally. These attempts to describe hope’s object indicate the difficulty of describing exactly what a moral object is.\n4207 \n4207 |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1783-1717 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.2143/RTPM.87.1.3287582 |