Ethik im Mittelalter und im frühen Humanismus: Kritische Studie über eine «Kritische Studie»
This paper argues that G. Guldentops’s review of S. Ebbersmeyer’s Homo agens (published in RTPM 77 [2010]) does not do justice to her wellgrounded and exemplarily structured study, which is a landmark in the research on early Renaissance moral philosophy. Among other aspects the paper focuses on the...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | German |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Peeters
2011
|
| In: |
Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales
Year: 2011, Volume: 78, Issue: 2, Pages: 481-505 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | This paper argues that G. Guldentops’s review of S. Ebbersmeyer’s Homo agens (published in RTPM 77 [2010]) does not do justice to her wellgrounded and exemplarily structured study, which is a landmark in the research on early Renaissance moral philosophy. Among other aspects the paper focuses on the relation of early Italian humanists to the medieval scholastic tradition.\n4207 \n4207 |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1783-1717 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.2143/RTPM.78.2.2141899 |